La Société allemande pour l'anomalistique (Gesellschaft für Anomalistik) publie un nouvel ouvrage sur des études de cas uniques en anomalistique, coordonné par le sociologue et psychologue Gerhard Mayer (IGPP), qui est la reprise en anglais d'un ouvrage originellement publiées en allemand.
Gerhard Mayer & Michael Schetsche (2011). N gleich 1. Methodik und Methodologie anomalistischer Einzelfallstudien.
Présentation de l'ouvrage
Single case studies have a long tradition in the field of parapsychology and anomalistics research. Naturally, thorough case studies do not usually provide hard evidence for the existence of paranormal effects. However, they demonstrate the dynamics of occurrence of such extraordinary phenomena and experiences in the living world. This volume is intended to give an overview of the methodological peculiarities of anomalistic field research. On the basis of historical and current case studies, certain specific psychosocial dynamics and problems in this interesting and challenging field of research are presented and discussed.
This book contains 15 chapters written by different authors on the subject of single case studies. Although the focus is on poltergeist cases, other fields of anomalistics are also addressed, such as the UFO topic, cryptozoology, or allegedly photographic anomalies.
Table des matièrse
Mon chapitre sur le cas du "poltergeist" d'Amnéville
- Evrard, R. (2019). The "Amnéville RSPK case": An illustration of social elusiveness? In : G. Mayer (dir.), N equals 1. Single case studies in anomalistics (pp. 377-392). Berlin, Allemagne : Lit Verlag.
Je présenterai ce travail lors du congrès PA à de début juillet 2019 à Paris, comme je l'avais fait auparavant en Allemagne (WGFP) et pour l'Association des Amis de l'IMI (vidéo disponible pour les membres).
- Evrard, R. (2015, octobre). The "Amnéville’s RSPK case": An illustration of social elusivity? 31e WGFP Workshop, Offenbourg.
- Evrard, R. (2018). Le cas du « poltergeist » d’Amnéville : une illustration de l’élusivité sociale ? Conférence organisée par l’A-IMI, Paris (14/12/18).
Abstract
During the summer 2014, at less than two
kilometers from my house, started a seemingly RSPK case which attracted media
attention in France and abroad. An old couple with a teenage nephew observed
unexplained displacements and destructions of objects in several rooms of their
house. Neighbors, policemen, and journalists quickly arrived and added their
own testimonies which deepened the strangeness. In few months, the case was
partly “solved”, not through a scientific enquiry, but by the self-accusation
of the old “hysterical” woman and a trial that concluded a dismissal of all
charges (“non-lieu”). Without having the possibility to interview the
protagonists themselves, despite two attempts, I stayed as an observer of the
social treatment of this paranormal story. I collected all press articles, video
reports, online discussions, and also informal local discussions to document
the various socio-psychological reactions at the different steps of the case.
Following the Model of Pragmatic Information’s application to RSPK case
(Lucadou & Zahradnik, 2004), I will illustrate the four phases of this
case: surprise, displacement, decline, and suppression phases. This model
allowed me to make public predictions which were verified. Then, I will focus
on the “suppression phase” where there is a kind of social influence to restore
normality instead of the disturbing paranormality. I suggest to call this
action “social elusiveness” (Evrard, 2012) and to discuss its place in
parapsychology.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire